<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>PowerShell on Stefan Dohnal</title><link>https://stefan.dohnal.online/tags/powershell/</link><description>Recent content in PowerShell on Stefan Dohnal</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 14:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://stefan.dohnal.online/tags/powershell/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>MemberOf retirement in Entra ID: two announcements, one design question</title><link>https://stefan.dohnal.online/blog/memberof-retirement-in-entra-id-two-announcements-one-design-question/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 14:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://stefan.dohnal.online/blog/memberof-retirement-in-entra-id-two-announcements-one-design-question/</guid><description>Table of contents What Microsoft actually announced Timeline Gate 1 – Do you have Entra ID Governance? Gate 2 – Why do you have groups in groups? A pragmatic migration plan Testing the migration in a lab tenant Pitfalls Strategic perspective – what this really changes Wrapping up What Microsoft actually announced Microsoft published two Message Center posts about the memberOf rule operator for dynamic membership in Microsoft Entra ID.</description></item></channel></rss>